Turn your background, interests, and values into three career paths with AI-risk ratings and concrete next steps.
Coding
Career
Evaluate offers, negotiate compensation, plan promotions or pivots, and respond to career setbacks.
What it does
Get decision frameworks and practical guidance for offers, compensation, equity, promotions, pivots, and layoffs. Advice starts from total compensation, market band, live alternatives, constraints, and values, then applies BATNA, risk, vesting, and package-level negotiation checks. It guides your decisions rather than acting for you, and does not write resumes or run job applications.
When to use it
- Comparing an offer or counteroffer
- Preparing a raise or promotion case
- Choosing whether to stay, quit, or pivot
- Responding to a layoff, PIP, firing, or rescinded offer
The skill document
Advise mode: this skill guides a human making their own career moves; it never acts on their behalf. User career data lives in ~/Clawic/data/career/ (see setup.md on first use, memory-template.md for file formats): profile.md holds comp history, market band, constraints, and stated values — create it on the first substantive session and update after each decision. If you have data at an old location (~/career/ or ~/clawic/career/), move it to ~/Clawic/data/career/.
When To Use
- An offer or counteroffer is on the table and the user must respond
- Deciding whether to stay, leave, or pivot role, company, or track
- Building a promotion case, asking for a raise, or diagnosing a stalled level
- Responding to a layoff, PIP, firing, or rescinded offer
- Valuing equity, comparing offers, or benchmarking comp against the market
- Not for writing the resume itself (resume) or running the application pipeline (job-search)
Quick Reference
| Situation | Play |
|---|---|
| Offer received | Never accept in the call; written details, 48 hours, counter once minimum (offers.md) |
| Asked for salary expectations first | Deflect once; if forced, state a range whose bottom is your target (offers.md) |
| Exploding deadline (under 1 week) | Request one week in writing; treat refusal as data about the employer |
| Recruiter ping while happy | Extract the band before committing to a process (market.md) |
| Offer heavy on equity or options | Risk-adjust before comparing — face value is the optimistic read (equity.md) |
| "Should I quit?" | No decision without a BATNA (Rule 1); run the razor (→ The Decision Razor) |
| Stalled 2+ promotion cycles | Diagnose scope vs sponsor vs structure (promotion.md) |
| Underpaid suspicion | Confirm with band data, then internal ask before external move (market.md) |
| Changing role and industry at once | One variable per move (Rule 4; pivots.md) |
| Laid off, fired, or PIP'd | 48-hour sequence; sign nothing on day one (layoffs.md) |
| Counteroffer after resigning | Decline by default: root cause persists and flight risk is now on record |
| Director-and-above move | Different mechanics: negotiate severance at entry (executive.md) |
| Happy, no active decision | Market check every 18-24 months: 2-3 recruiter conversations to reprice the band |
| Anything else | Collect three facts before advising: current total comp, market band, live alternatives |
Depth on demand: offers.md evaluate, compare, counter · equity.md RSUs, options, vesting math · promotion.md levels, calibration, internal raises · pivots.md role, industry, track changes, breaks, going independent · layoffs.md layoffs, PIPs, severance, visas · market.md benchmarking and staying liquid · executive.md director-and-above moves.
Core Rules
- No BATNA, no decision. "Stay or go" without a concrete outside option is a mood poll. Check: can the user name a specific alternative and its comp? If not, the first step is generating options, not deciding.
- Counter = 2 × target − offer. Offer 100k, target 112k, counter 124k: negotiations gravitate toward the midpoint of the two stated numbers, so countering at your target guarantees landing below it.
- Switchers outprice stayers. Atlanta Fed Wage Growth Tracker: job switchers beat stayers by roughly 1-2 percentage points of annual wage growth in most years. This is the base-rate argument behind the 18-24 month market check even when content.
- One-variable transitions. Per move, change role OR industry OR track (IC to manager), not two. Each simultaneous change resets leverage to beginner on that axis; two at once typically costs both comp and title.
- Promotion is a lagging indicator. You get promoted for having already done the next level's job for 6-12 months with witnesses outside your team. If nobody above your manager can describe your work, the packet fails at calibration.
- Negotiate the package, not the base. Typical employer flexibility, most to least: sign-on bonus, equity, start date and vacation, title and review timing, base. Sign-on is a one-time cost to them; moving base reprices their whole band.
- Reversibility sets the risk bar. If a move can be undone within about 12 months (boomerang hire, internal transfer back, contract work), bias toward acting; irreversible moves (relocation with family, visa changes, walking away from a cliff) get the full BATNA-plus-runway treatment.
- Resign only on paper. A verbal offer is a mood; resign only on a written offer with contingencies (background check, references) cleared. A rescind after resignation is a self-inflicted layoff.
The Decision Razor
Diagnose before prescribing; a bad manager and a bad career have opposite fixes.
- (a) Would a different manager fix this? Internal transfer before quitting (
promotion.md). (b) Would the same role at a better company fix it? Switch companies, keep the role (Rule 4). (c) Does the work itself drain you even in good weeks, for 3+ months? Pivot, planned as a one-variable move (pivots.md). - Quitting without an offer requires runway of at least 2× realistic search time. Senior searches commonly run 3-6 months, so hold 6-12 months of expenses in cash, not "some savings"; executive searches run longer — scale the same formula (
executive.md). - Tenure math: sunk years are not an asset; unvested equity is. Compute the dollar cost of leaving before the next vest date (
equity.md) and treat only that number as the price of leaving.
Offer Response In Brief
Full sequence in offers.md; the spine:
- Everything in writing: base, bonus target with payout history, equity grant with vest schedule and cliff, sign-on with clawback terms, refresher policy.
- Compute annualized total comp yourself; recruiters quote best case.
- Set target from the market band (
market.md), never from current comp. "Current plus 15%" is an anchor, not a target. - Counter once at 2 × target − offer (Rule 2), justified with one sentence of market data, never personal need.
- Base capped? Walk the flexibility ladder in Rule 6 order.
Internal negotiation is a different game: performance already known, peer equity beats market rate, and you need a champion in the room, not just a request (promotion.md). Never wave an external offer you are unwilling to take.
Output Gates
Before delivering career advice, check:
- Did I get current total comp, market band, and live alternatives before recommending any number or any stay/quit call?
- Is every counter I proposed computed as 2 × target − offer, not the midpoint of the visible range?
- Did I check unvested equity and cliff dates before endorsing a departure timeline?
- When no live alternative exists, did I recommend generating a BATNA instead of deciding?
- If
visa_dependentor a non-USregionapplies, did I adjust legal defaults and timelines (layoffs.md)? - Is the recommendation scored against the values in
profile.md, not against brand prestige?
Configuration
User-dependent variables. Defaults apply until the user states a preference; store them in ~/Clawic/data/career/config.yaml.
| Variable | Type | Default | Effect |
|---|---|---|---|
| region | US | EU | UK | other | US | Switches employment-law defaults in layoffs.md: at-will vs statutory notice, severance norms, non-compete enforceability |
| career_stage | early | mid | senior | executive | mid | Routes director-and-above questions to executive.md; scales search-time and runway estimates in The Decision Razor |
| risk_posture | conservative | moderate | aggressive | moderate | Conservative doubles runway floors and defaults against irreversible moves (Rule 7); aggressive accepts reversible bets at 1× runway |
| visa_dependent | bool | false | Adds immigration clocks to every timeline: layoff grace periods, job-change risk, start-date and termination-date negotiation |
Preference areas to record as the user reveals them:
- comp philosophy — cash vs equity weighting, appetite for private-company paper; affects offer scoring in
offers.mdand equity discounting inequity.md - constraints — location and remote requirements, excluded industries, family or caregiving limits; affects option generation before any stay/leave call
- values ranking — what "better" means (comp, learning, autonomy, mission, hours), stored ranked in
profile.md; affects how offers and stay/leave options are scored - coaching style — frameworks only vs drafted word-for-word scripts, blunt vs cushioned delivery; affects the format of every negotiation deliverable
Traps
| Trap | Why it fails | Do instead |
|---|---|---|
| Accepting on the call | Peak-emotion decision at their anchor | 48 hours and written details, always |
| Naming your number first | Anchors at your guess of their band, usually low | Deflect once; if forced, range with target at the bottom |
| Comparing offers on year-1 base | Bonus reality, vest schedule, and refreshers dominate by year 3 | Normalize to 4-year total value (offers.md) |
| Resigning to force a counteroffer | Root cause persists and you are flagged as flight risk | Resign only when ready to leave |
| "I have invested 5 years here" | Sunk cost; tenure is not an asset, unvested equity is | Price only the forward-looking cost of leaving |
| Chasing title over scope | Inflated title with unchanged scope fails the next interview loop | Trade title for scope, budget, or reports |
| Calling a mentor a sponsor | Advice does not move calibration decisions | Verify who speaks for you in the room (promotion.md) |
| Negotiating base only | Base is their stickiest number | Sign-on, equity, dates, title first (Rule 6) |
| Interviewing only when desperate | Desperation prices in; the band is stale exactly when you need it | Market check on elapsed time, not unhappiness (market.md) |
| Prestige capture | Optimizing for logo approval over fit compounds misery | Score offers against stored profile values, not brand names |
Where Experts Disagree
- Passion-first vs skill-first: both schools hold conditionally. Under about 5 years of experience, skills compound faster than self-knowledge, so bias skill-first (the career-capital position, Newport); with rare skills banked, passion picks between good options.
- Generalist vs specialist: specialize while the field expands (early markets pay depth); generalize as it consolidates (mature markets pay range and management).
- Loyalty premium: tenure-track systems (government, academia, some East Asian conglomerates) genuinely pay tenure; the switcher math of Rule 3 is calibrated to open-market private sectors and reverses there.
Related Skills
More Clawic skills, get them at https://clawic.com/skills/career (install if the user confirms):
job-search— running the pipeline: applications, company research, interview prepresume— when the decision is made and materials need targetingnegotiate— negotiation mechanics beyond comp: limits, principals, approvalscomp-design— the employer side: designing base, bonus, and equity mix
Feedback
- If useful, star it: https://clawic.com/skills/career
- Latest version: https://clawic.com/skills/career
Part of Clawic, the verified skill library. Get this skill: https://clawic.com/skills/career.
Questions people ask
- What information is needed before recommending a number or a stay-or-leave decision?
- It first collects current total compensation, the relevant market band, and live alternatives. Departure timing also requires checking unvested equity and cliff dates, while recommendations are scored against your stated values and constraints.
- How does it approach offer negotiation?
- It asks for the full package in writing, annualizes total compensation, sets a target from the market band, and computes a single counter as 2 × target − offer. If base is capped, it considers sign-on, equity, dates, title, and review timing.
- Can it help after a layoff, PIP, firing, or rescinded offer?
- Yes. It uses a 48-hour response sequence, advises signing nothing on day one, and adjusts timelines when region or visa dependency changes the legal and immigration context.
Related skills
Builds a personalized career plan with fit assessments, AI-risk ratings, and staged next steps.
Turn financial questions and inputs into stock research, valuation models, portfolio reviews, and formatted reports.
Work through uncertain ideas iteratively to clarify options, tradeoffs, and a strategy.
Draft legal documents, policies, memos, and compliance checklists from detailed natural-language requirements.
Manage client work from lead qualification to payment, renewal, or exit with dated drafts and local records.