Memory

Domain Authority Auditor

Audits a domain’s citation trust against a locked peer cohort using a 40-item CITE profile.

What it does

Audit one domain’s citation, identity, trust, and eminence signals against a locked peer cohort using a 40-item CITE profile. The workflow records evidence dates and coverage, marks unavailable data Unknown, and positively verifies manipulation or penalty vetoes. It returns a typed status and SHIP, FIX, BLOCK, or UNDECIDED verdict, with component scores only when required evidence and runtime are available.

When to use it

  • Establishing a peer-relative CITE baseline
  • Reassessing trust after link or penalty changes
  • Checking citation readiness for a domain
  • Comparing several domains through separate cohort-locked runs

The skill document

Domain Authority Auditor

Audit one domain's citation-trust signals relative to a declared peer cohort. Produce a complete CITE score only when all applicable evidence and comparison context are present. CITE is advisory; it does not predict whether an answer engine will cite the domain.

When This Must Trigger

  • The user asks whether a domain is trustworthy, authoritative, or citation-ready.
  • A campaign needs a peer-relative CITE baseline or rerun.
  • Link, entity, penalty, or citation evidence may materially change a domain gate.

Quick Start

Audit example.com against these five same-stage U.S. SaaS peers.
Run the CITE content-publisher profile; mark every private-data gap Unknown.

Skill Contract

Use offsite-signal-analyzer for link diagnosis without a gate, content-quality-auditor for one page, and entity-registry for canonical entity repair. Compare multiple domains as separate same-profile runs; never score them as one pooled target.

Reads: one domain, one locked cohort, and dated citation/identity/trust/eminence evidence. Writes: only a permissioned v3 artifact. Done when: context is complete, all 40 states are explicit, the scorer result is preserved, and any saved artifact validates.

Instructions

Runtime Contract

Read ../../../references/auditor-runbook.md, scoring-semantics.md, cite-domain-rating.md, and the CITE entry in framework-catalog.json. For standalone installs, use bundled immutable references/auditor-runtime.md; never fetch mutable main or guess missing policy. Before deterministic calls, follow runtime-invocation.md, resolve AARON_SKILLS_ROOT="${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT:-$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null || true)}", and require the scorer, validator, and typed catalogs. If unavailable, return score_state: NOT_SCORED / score_confidence: not_scored with no gate verdict or persistent artifact.

Required Setup

Declare:

  • one canonical domain and observation date;
  • market and entity stage;
  • domain type/profile: default, content-publisher, product-service, ecommerce, community-ugc, tool-utility, or authority-institutional;
  • a locked peer cohort with inclusion rules and evidence window.

Without peer cohort, market, stage, or domain type, return NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED; the inherited numeric anchors are diagnostic priors, not universal thresholds.

Data Sources

NeedPreferred evidence
LinksDated backlink export/index with known coverage
IdentityStructured data, canonical profiles, knowledge-graph/public entity evidence
TrustLink-history comparison, security checks, authorized console evidence
EminenceSearch/analytics visibility and locked peer/query panels
CohortNamed domains plus inclusion/exclusion, market, stage, type, and window

Evidence Procedure

  1. Normalize the domain and verify scope (host/subdomain/protocol treatment).
  2. Freeze backlink, entity, security, search visibility, citation-panel, and reputation evidence with sources/dates.
  3. Evaluate all 40 IDs against the declared cohort. Tool estimates remain estimated or proxy; user exports remain user-provided unless independently verified.
  4. Use Unknown for absent backlink indexes, private console data, or comparison universes. Do not mark link-dependent items N/A simply because data is unavailable.
  5. Apply catalog-authorized N/A only with a reason, for example an AI-citation item when no locked panel is in scope.
  6. Verify vetoes positively:
    • CITE-T03: material link/traffic incoherence plus corroborating manipulation evidence relative to the cohort.
    • CITE-T05: verified manipulation network after common-source/ecosystem adjustment.
    • CITE-T09: verified active manual action or material unresolved deindexing.

Domain youth, privacy-protected WHOIS, low absolute volume, or missing private-console access cannot by themselves fail a veto.

Create a typed audit-run.schema.json input and execute python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/rubric-score.py" score when the verified runtime is available. Never renormalize weights around Unknown items.

Report

Begin with the auditor-runbook's exact typed conversation header. Never replace status, verdict, or score_state with prose; list each explicitly missing qualified item as ``ID: `unknown``` before findings.

Lead with verdict, profile/cohort/target/date, score or NOT_SCORED coverage/interval, and confidence. Then provide:

  • C/I/T/E score and coverage table;
  • peer-relative evidence and cohort definition;
  • verified risks versus unresolved Unknowns;
  • top fixes with owner, evidence needed, and rerun condition;
  • provenance appendix, including qualified IDs when detailed traceability is requested.

Use SHIP/FIX/BLOCK/UNDECIDED as the canonical artifact verdict. User-facing prose may say trusted/cautious only as a descriptive translation, never as a separate decision system.

Verdict Rules

  • Complete, no veto, healthy score/no failures: DONE + SHIP.
  • Complete, remediation needed or one veto: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS + FIX; one veto caps final at 59.
  • Complete, 2+ verified vetoes: DONE + BLOCK; no final score.
  • Missing applicable/cohort evidence: NEEDS_INPUT + UNDECIDED; no score.

Route link investigation to offsite-signal-analyzer, technical/index evidence to technical-seo-checker, entity repair to entity-registry, and page quality to content-quality-auditor.

§2 CITE Worked Examples

  • Complete product-service profile, raw 78, one verified T09 failure: DONE_WITH_CONCERNS/FIX, final 59.
  • Complete profile, raw 45, one verified T05 failure: final remains 45; the ceiling never raises a score.
  • Verified T03 and T05 failures with complete evidence: DONE/BLOCK, raw retained, no final score.
  • Missing backlink universe or private-console evidence: affected items are Unknown and no total is emitted.

§3 CITE Guardrails

  • Young domain age and WHOIS privacy are neutral without contradictory evidence.
  • A press/launch spike can explain link velocity; test the explanation before labeling manipulation.
  • Absolute volume is interpreted within peer cohort, entity stage, market, and domain type.
  • Public index absence does not prove a private manual action; T09 requires positive evidence.

§5 CITE Translation

Use plain descriptions by default. On a trace request, show CITE-T03, CITE-T05, and CITE-T09 with source/date/cohort; never expose an unqualified ID.

Persistence

Persist only after explicit authorization. Assemble the complete v3 draft, validate it against the intended memory/audits/domain/YYYY-MM-DD-.md relative path, persist only through one full-content Write, and revalidate the target. Edit/shell/MCP mutations of the reserved sink are unsupported. Use:

python3 "$AARON_SKILLS_ROOT/scripts/validate-audit-artifact.py"  --relative-path 

The audit request itself does not authorize hot-cache, candidate, or registry writes.

Validation Checkpoints

  • Target/profile/market/stage/cohort are explicit and locked.
  • All 40 IDs have evidence-backed state, Unknown, or valid N/A.
  • Absolute anchors were not applied as cohort-independent laws.
  • Vetoes are verified failures, not absence-of-evidence shortcuts.
  • Scorer output, coverage, confidence, status, and verdict are preserved.
  • Persisted artifact is permissioned, path-correct, minimized, and validator-clean.

Reference Materials

  • CITE benchmark
  • Auditor runbook
  • Scoring semantics
  • Offsite signal analyzer

Next Best Skill

  • Investigate links: offsite-signal-analyzer
  • Repair entity state: entity-registry
  • Verify technical/index state: technical-seo-checker
  • Audit representative content: content-quality-auditor

Questions people ask

What inputs are required for a scored audit?
Provide one canonical domain, observation date, market, entity stage, domain profile, and a locked peer cohort with inclusion rules and an evidence window. Missing cohort, market, stage, type, or applicable evidence leads to NEEDS_INPUT/UNDECIDED with no total score.
How does the audit handle missing or private data?
Unavailable backlink indexes, private console data, and missing comparison universes are marked Unknown rather than treated as failures or N/A. Weights are not renormalized around Unknown items.
Does a low score or young domain automatically trigger a manipulation verdict?
No. Domain youth, WHOIS privacy, low absolute volume, and missing private-console access cannot by themselves fail a veto; manipulation and manual-action vetoes require positive, corroborated evidence.

Related skills

Audits one content artifact against 80 CORE-EEAT items and returns evidence gaps, a verdict, and a fix plan.

143 installs1 stars

Scores page-level SEO signals and turns the findings into a prioritized P0/P1/P2 repair plan.

139 installs3 stars

Find technical SEO blockers and turn the evidence into scored, prioritized fixes.

161 installs6 stars

Turns content into quotable answer blocks and reports GEO scores, query coverage, and citation readiness.

127 installs7 stars

Audit, reconcile, and record machine-facing entity identity with evidence and provenance.

87 installs2 stars