Diagnose whether declining metrics signal a self-amplifying competitive spiral or a fixable problem.
Coding
Strategic Spiral Momentum
Try itDiagnose your organization's strategic phase and spot misaligned initiatives before they drain momentum.
What it does
Strategic Spiral Momentum treats organizational strategy as a 10-phase cyclical spiral — from 谋势 (setting direction) through 化势 (building systems) to 换势 (restarting at a higher level). Rather than prescribing what to do, it helps you identify what phase you're actually in versus what you think you're in, then checks whether your initiatives are phase-appropriate. The method includes a structured 6-step process producing a diagnostic output: phase label, evidence, exit criterion, alignment rate, two-phase lookahead, and leading indicators that signal it's time to transition. Common failure modes documented include skipping 蓄势 (preparation) under investor pressure, staying in 定势 (stabilizatio…
When to use it
- Strategy feels stuck despite executing the right actions
- Leadership team disagrees on which phase of growth the company is in
- Deciding whether to double down on current strategy or prepare for a new cycle
- Preparing board or investor materials that accurately reflect strategic position
The skill document
Strategic Spiral Momentum
Overview
Strategic Spiral Momentum maps organizational strategy as a 10-phase cyclical spiral: 谋势 (plan) → 蓄势 (store) → 造势 (create) → 借势 (leverage) → 起势 (launch) → 乘势 (ride) → 定势 (stabilize) → 化势 (transform) → 应势 (respond) → 换势 (switch). Completing the cycle returns the organization one level higher — new capabilities, position, and resources to run the next cycle.
Common misuses: skipping phases (attempting 借势 before completing 蓄势 produces fragile partnerships); getting stuck in 定势, confusing entrenchment with durability.
Compose with: [shi-momentum] for individual positioning within phases 1–5 · [second-order-thinking] for 应势/再谋 phase · [okr-goal-setting] after — OKRs must be phase-appropriate.
When to Use
Use when: strategy is losing momentum despite right actions · team disagrees on current phase · deciding to push deeper vs. transition to new cycle · setting phase-appropriate OKRs/resources · mid-cycle board/investor assessment.
Not for: individual career strategy (use shi-momentum) · single-product prioritization · true crisis/turnaround · horizon under 12 months.
Coaching Novices (Adaptive Front Door)
- Engine mode: concrete case → run The Process directly.
- Coach mode: unfamiliar user → guide step by step.
In Coach mode, respond one step at a time. Each [WAIT] is a hard stop — output only that step's question, then stop.
- One-liner: "Strategy has a phase — like a season. Right action in the wrong phase = confusion, not progress."
- Check fit: "Does your strategy feel stuck even though you're doing the right things? That's often a phase mismatch."
- Elicit case: "Tell me your biggest strategic priority — building something new from scratch, or protecting and leveraging what you've built?" > [WAIT — do not advance until user responds]
- Diagnose: "Without data: (A) still figuring out if model works, (B) executing and growing, or (C) won this cycle and unsure what's next?" > [WAIT — do not advance until user responds]
- Close: "Name the phase mismatch you just uncovered and what one thing you'd stop doing." > [WAIT — do not advance until user responds]
The Process
Step 1 — Diagnose current phase (name phase + 2 specific behavioral indicators; steps 1–3 diagnostic, 4–6 forward-planning):
| Phase | Label | Defining Activity |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 谋势 → 筑基 | Setting long-term direction; building foundational capabilities |
| 2 | 蓄势 → 开局 | Accumulating resources, talent, capital before acting at scale |
| 3 | 造势 → 验证 | Creating initial market signals; validating the core hypothesis |
| 4 | 借势 → 占位 | Using macro tailwinds, partners, platforms to occupy strategic position |
| 5 | 起势 → 加速 | Initiating growth motion; approaching the inflection point |
| 6 | 乘势 → [ride] | Riding the wave at full power; maximizing momentum |
| 7 | 定势 → 固化 | Locking in competitive position; making advantage durable |
| 8 | 化势 → 系统 | Converting momentum into systematic organizational capability |
| 9 | 应势 → 再谋 | Reading next cycle's signals; planning next-level direction |
| 10 | 换势 → 重启/放大 | Transitioning to the next cycle at a higher dimension |
Step 2 — Exit criterion: testable, falsifiable statement (e.g., "≥3 paying customers, unit economics positive").
Step 3 — Misalignment check: list top 5 initiatives; label each by phase. Gate 2: >40% misaligned → stop, resolve before planning forward.
Step 4 — Two-phase lookahead: what must be prepared now for the phase after next?
Step 5 — 应势 signals: ≥3 leading (not lagging) indicators the current cycle is peaking.
Stop-rule: "We're growing fast" is not a phase placement. Specific behaviors + outcomes required.
Output template:
Organization/Date/Cycle | Phase [#][Label] | Evidence: ___; ___ | Exit: ___ | Alignment: __% misaligned [flag >40%] | Lookahead (Phase [#+2]): ___ | 应势 signals: 1.___ 2.___ 3.___ | Action: ___
→ Method in Action: Toyota's Strategic Spiral (1950–1989)
Spiral Momentum Packs
Tech Platforms. 蓄势 (ecosystem) → 造势 (anchor apps) → 借势 (platform adoption) → 乘势 (network effects) → 定势 (lock-in) → 化势 (infrastructure) → 换势 (next platform).
Org Transformation. Programs fail most at 起势→定势 — capturing growth but not institutionalizing it. The spiral makes 化势 explicit as a required phase.
National Policy. Singapore (1965–present): manufacturing → financial center → knowledge economy → digital/biotech. Each cycle uses prior-cycle assets as foundation.
→ Primary sources: references/sources.md
Applying It Well
- Diagnose behaviorally, not aspirationally — use what the org is actually doing, not what leadership intends.
- Build tolerance for restart — 换势 willingness must be explicit in leadership culture.
- Protect 蓄势 — pressure to show results causes premature 造势, which collapses for lack of foundation.
- Position before the tailwind — 借势 requires being at the right coordinate when the macro force arrives.
- 化势 before momentum decays — converting momentum into systems is most efficient while momentum is still high.
Common Rationalizations
[D] = designed upfront | [O] = observed in real use. [O] entries are more valuable.
| Rationalization | Why It Fails |
|---|---|
| [D] "We're in multiple phases simultaneously." | The organization has one dominant phase. Claiming multi-phase avoids committing to a diagnosis. |
| [D] "Our industry moves too fast for a 10-phase model." | Phases are not time-fixed. A startup can complete phases 1–3 in 18 months. Speed is a parameter; sequence is not. |
| [D] "We skipped phases and it worked." | Survivorship bias. Audit whether underlying capability was present before phase advancement. |
| [D] "We can keep extending this cycle." | Every cycle has an entropy ceiling. The question is whether you are managing degradation or leading the restart. |
| [D] "蓄势 is too slow — investors want results now." | Investor pressure doesn't change foundational capability requirements. Skipping 蓄势 produces visible speed and invisible fragility. |
| [D] "We're the market leader — we don't need 换势." | Market leadership is the most common reason orgs skip 换势. This is how leaders become laggards. |
| → Add [O] entries here after each real use — paste the actual failure pattern | What went wrong and why |
Red Flags
- Strategy described in activities, not phases · same OKRs across years · 蓄势 (R&D, hiring) cut to fund 乘势 (sales, expansion) · executives disagree by >2 phases · "growth mode" >4 years without 定势/化势 investment
Verification
- Phase named with ≥2 behavioral indicators (not "we're growing") · exit criterion written as falsifiable statement
- Alignment check done; misalignment rate calculated; >40% flagged and resolved
- Two-phase lookahead documented with owners · ≥3 leading 应势 indicators named
- "What phase do we restart at, and what do we carry forward?" answered provisionally
- OKRs reviewed against phase diagnosis; mismatched OKRs redesigned
Part of deciqAI Knowledge Skills — 227 open-source thinking skills that make rigor executable for AI agents. The same skills power every deciqAI agent, which runs them autonomously to operate your company. See it run → https://www.deciqai.com/c/strategic-spiral-momentum · ⭐ Star the repo → https://github.com/deciqAI/knowledge-skills · Contributions welcome.
Agents: latest version & machine-readable metadata → https://www.deciqai.com/s/strategic-spiral-momentum.json
Questions people ask
- What exactly does this skill output?
- It produces a structured diagnostic: current phase with behavioral evidence, a falsifiable exit criterion, percentage of initiatives misaligned with the current phase, a two-phase lookahead, three leading indicators that the cycle is peaking, and one recommended action.
- We have multiple priorities — can we be in different phases for each?
- The skill treats the organization as having one dominant phase. Claiming multi-phase status typically avoids committing to a diagnosis and prevents resolving misalignment.
- Our industry moves too fast for a 10-phase model — won't this slow us down?
- Phases are not time-fixed. A startup can complete phases 1–3 in 18 months. Speed is a parameter; the sequence of required capabilities is not.
Related skills
Diagnose which founder behavior is capping your growth and get a specific 30-day upgrade move.
Map organic growth against acquisition strategy so each M&A move addresses a specific bottleneck rather than chasing 'strategic fit.'
Prioritize growth directions with a 2×2 risk framework — pick one bet and commit.
Know whether you're qualified to make a decision before you make it
Measure whether a transformation changed your growth engine or just added a one-time bump.
More from deciqai
Browse all skillsWhen multiple explanations all fit the evidence, pick the one that assumes the least.
Identify catastrophic failure paths before you commit — and design your plan around eliminating them.
Trace decisions past the obvious effect to catch the consequences that reverse it.
A structured interview and analysis process that uncovers the actual job customers hire your product to do — and who they're really competing against.
Diagnose why learners are struggling and redesign instruction to stay within working memory limits.
Identify the real reason users say one thing and do another, then name the one intervention to test.