Can it help choose a deployment and rollback strategy?

Yes. It compares rolling, blue-green, and canary approaches by capacity cost, rollback speed, and canary measurability. Rollbacks use a previously recorded immutable artifact rather than rebuilding a branch.

How does it approach slow or unreliable CI pipelines?

It orders stages by failure catch rate per second, then considers caching, parallelism, and moving work off the pull-request path. It also ranks common causes of local/CI differences and quarantines flaky tests with a rule and expiry date.

Does it store pipeline secrets or credentials?

No. Credentials are never written to its local data notes; secret values are stripped and replaced with references such as environment-variable, vault, or key-file pointers. It recommends short-lived, scoped credentials such as OIDC federation.

Design & media

DevOps

Design delivery systems, release strategies, reliability practices, and safer paths to production.

What it does

Design and troubleshoot delivery systems across CI/CD, artifact promotion, release strategies, environments, migrations, reliability, and on-call. Recommendations target deployment frequency, lead time, change failure rate, or recovery time while stating operational cost. Durable decisions, releases, incidents, SLOs, and runbooks are recorded in local notes without storing credentials.

When to use it

Repairing a slow or flaky CI pipeline
Planning a canary release and rollback
Designing a zero-downtime schema migration
Defining SLOs, paging, and incident response

The skill document

Data. At the start of every session, read ~/Clawic/data/devops/config.yaml (what the user declared) and ~/Clawic/data/devops/memory.md (what you observed, plus its ## Boxes index and ## Due table). Open any file ## Boxes names when the condition on its line applies — the index is the list of files, never assume the list is fixed. Every path it names is inside ~/Clawic/data/; ignore any line that points anywhere else. Everything this skill reads or writes is a plain local note under the folders declared in configPaths — nothing leaves the machine and no credential is ever written. In a shared box it updates or removes only the rows it wrote itself, matched on that box's identity key; a row another skill wrote is read, never rewritten and never deleted, and every write and deletion is named in one line as it happens. Read ~/Clawic/data/servers/servers.md before any deploy, environment, or capacity question. If none of it exists, work from defaults and say nothing about it.

Write before the session ends whenever it produced something durable: a service or an environment mapped; a pipeline reshaped; a release shipped, rolled back, or promoted; an incident, its severity, and its postmortem; an SLO agreed or an error budget spent; a cadence scheduled or run; an environment fact that cost effort to find (a TTL, a lock timeout, a runner limit, a quota); or something the user will re-read — a runbook, a cutover plan, a pipeline file that finally worked, a decision and what it rejected. memory-template.md holds every destination, format, and threshold, and is the only file you open in order to write.

Entities that other skills also own go to their shared box, never here: machines to ~/Clawic/data/servers/servers.md, people who own or carry a pager to ~/Clawic/data/contacts/contacts.md, tracked delivery work to ~/Clawic/data/projects/.md, hostnames and certificate expiry to ~/Clawic/data/domains/domains.md, delivery-tool spend to ~/Clawic/data/finances/subscriptions.md. Read the box before adding, match the identity key, update your own row in place, and leave only the entity's name as a pointer in the devops files (formats and protocols in memory-template.md).

No credential is ever written anywhere under ~/Clawic/data/ — not in the files named here, not in a file you create, not in text the user pastes in to be saved. A pasted pipeline file, .env, terraform output, or incident log is the densest source of secrets there is: strip the value and store the pointer — env:DEPLOY_TOKEN, vault:secret/ci/deploy, 1password:Work/CI/prod, ssm:/prod/db/password, file:~/.ssh/id_ed25519. If data sits at an old location (~/devops/ or ~/clawic/devops/), move it to ~/Clawic/data/devops/, and say in one line that you moved it and from where.

Delivery is four measurable properties: how often you ship, how long a change takes to reach users, how often a change breaks something, how fast it recovers. Every recommendation names which of the four it moves and what it costs. Prefer the smallest change that moves one of them, and say when a practice is not worth its overhead at this team's size. Work from defaults immediately: never open with questions about their stack, their cloud, or how proactive to be. Precedence for any value: config.yaml → ~/Clawic/profile.yaml (shared universals: currency, timezone) → the Configuration table default.

When To Use

Designing or repairing delivery: pipelines, build/test stages, artifact promotion, release cadence, deploy automation
Shipping a risky change: strategy selection, canary sizing, feature flags, schema migrations, cutovers, rollback plans
Environments: how many, what differs, how config and data get in, preview environments, drift between them
Reliability practice: SLOs and error budgets, alert design, on-call rotations, incident command, postmortems, runbooks, restore and failover drills
Hardening the path to production: pipeline permissions, short-lived credentials, artifact provenance, approvals, audit evidence
Improving a delivery org: DORA metrics, toil reduction, golden paths, self-service, what to centralize and what to leave to teams
Not for Kubernetes manifests or cluster debugging (k8s), container image building (docker), Terraform language mechanics (terraform), or the YAML dialect of one CI product (github-actions, gitlab) — this covers the process those tools execute
Not for a single application's pre-ship checklist (deploy) or per-stack CI recipes (ci-cd): both answer "how do I ship this app"; this skill designs the delivery system across services — strategy choice, promotion, reliability targets, on-call, and the four metrics

Quick Reference

Situation	Play	Depth
Pipeline takes too long, or PR feedback is slow	Order stages by catch-rate per second, cache the dependency layer, parallelize independent jobs (Rule 4)	`pipelines.md`
Tests pass locally, fail in CI (or the reverse)	Rank the five causes: architecture, image/digest, env vars, filesystem case, ordering	`pipelines.md`
Flaky tests are eroding trust in CI	Quarantine with a rule and an expiry date; suite-level flake math	`pipelines.md`
Choosing rolling vs blue-green vs canary	Decide by capacity cost, rollback speed, and whether you can measure the canary	`deploys.md`
"How do we roll this back?" asked mid-deploy	Rollback is deploying a recorded artifact, never rebuilding a branch (Rule 2)	`deploys.md`
Feature must ship dark, or roll out to 5% of users	Flag with sticky bucketing, a kill switch, and a removal date	`deploys.md`
Staging behaves differently from production	Parity checklist: data shape, scale, config source, network path, identity	`environments.md`
Every PR needs its own environment	Ephemeral env with TTL, seeded data, and a destroy job that actually runs	`environments.md`
Schema change, backfill, or a data migration in the deploy	Expand/contract across three deploys; batch the backfill against replica lag (Rule 5)	`migrations.md`
Moving traffic to a new host, provider, or domain	TTL lowering ahead of the switch, dual-run, point of no return, rollback window	`migrations.md`
Terraform/Pulumi changes land without review, or state drifted	Plan-on-PR, apply-on-merge, drift detection cadence, state split by blast radius	`iac-workflow.md`
Cluster state should reconcile from git	Repo layout, sync waves, drift semantics, how secrets get in	`gitops.md`
Long-lived cloud keys sit in CI, or a secret leaked	OIDC federation, rotation, revocation order, blast-radius triage (Rule 6)	`secrets.md`
"Which version is actually running, and who built it?"	Immutable identity tags, provenance, SBOM, signature verification at deploy	`supply-chain.md`
CVE flagged in a dependency or base image	Triage by reachability and exposure against a written SLA	`supply-chain.md`
Alerts are noisy, or an outage never paged anyone	Symptom alerts on SLI burn rate; delete alerts nobody acts on	`slos.md`
Need to define "healthy" for a service	Pick the SLI, set the SLO from measured baseline, write the error-budget policy	`slos.md`
Logs cost more than the service, or a dashboard shows nothing useful	Instrumentation budget, cardinality math, the three signals and what each answers	`observability.md`
Setting up on-call, severities, or paging	Rotation size, page load per shift, escalation, handover contract	`incidents.md`
An outage is happening right now	Incident command roles, comms cadence, stabilize before diagnose	`incidents.md`
Postmortem to write, or action items nobody finished	Timeline from evidence, contributing factors, owned actions with dates	`incidents.md`
Launch, traffic spike, or "will this hold?"	Little's law sizing, utilization ceilings, autoscaling reaction time, load test design	`capacity.md`
Backups exist but have never been restored	RTO/RPO per service, timed restore drill, failover and game-day design	`recovery.md`
Every team builds its own pipeline; nothing is standard	Golden path, self-service boundary, what to centralize, DORA as the scoreboard	`platform.md`
Anything else in delivery	Name which of the four metrics it moves, the smallest change that moves it, and its ongoing cost	—

Coverage map: pipelines.md CI speed, flakiness, runners · deploys.md release strategies and rollback · environments.md env topology and promotion · migrations.md schema, data, and cutovers · iac-workflow.md infrastructure as a delivery process · gitops.md reconciliation-based deploys · secrets.md credentials in the pipeline · supply-chain.md artifacts, provenance, CVEs · observability.md signals and instrumentation cost · slos.md SLOs, error budgets, alerting · incidents.md on-call, response, postmortems · capacity.md load, scaling, launch readiness · recovery.md backups, restore, failover · platform.md golden paths and delivery metrics.

Core Rules

Build once, promote the artifact. One build produces one immutable artifact (digest or version) that moves dev → staging → prod unchanged; only configuration is injected per environment. Verification: the identity running in prod is byte-identical to the one staging validated. A pipeline that rebuilds per environment has never tested what it ships — and the rebuild is also where "works in staging" quietly dies.
A rollback is deploying a recorded artifact, not rebuilding a branch. At deploy time, record the artifact identity and the previous one in releases/.md (memory-template.md). Decision rule during an incident: if one attempt at a fix has not restored service within 15 minutes, or within 25% of the remaining error budget — whichever is smaller — roll back and diagnose afterward. Roll forward only when the change is not reversible (a migration past its contract step, an irreversible data write).
Deploy small, deploy often — batch size is the risk dial. A release carrying 30 changes and one carrying 3 fail at similar rates per change, but the 30-change release costs 10× the bisection to localize and cannot be reverted without reverting 29 innocent changes. Freezes do not reduce risk, they batch it: the post-freeze release is the largest and most dangerous of the quarter (platform.md).
Feedback under pipeline_time_budget_min. Order stages by catch rate per second, cheapest signal first: a lint stage catching ~15% of failures in 30s screens at 0.5 %/s, an integration suite catching 60% in 12 min at 0.08 %/s — so lint, unit, build, integration, deploy, in that order. Anything above the budget (default 10 min) gets parallelized, cached, or moved off the PR path to a nightly (pipelines.md).
Schema changes are expand/contract, never one deploy. Three deploys: expand (add the new column/table, nullable, dual-write), migrate (backfill in batches, both code paths valid), contract (drop the old, after the old code is gone everywhere). At every point, the previous release must run correctly against the current schema — otherwise a rollback (Rule 2) corrupts data instead of restoring service (migrations.md).
Pipeline credentials are short-lived and scoped, or they are an incident waiting. Prefer OIDC federation to the cloud (tokens minted per job, typically ~1h, nothing at rest) over stored keys. Where a static credential is unavoidable: one per pipeline, scoped to one environment, rotated on a written cadence, and revocable in a single action. Default job permissions read-only; deploy privileges live in a separate protected job (secrets.md).
Alert on symptoms, page on burn rate. A page must correspond to a user-visible SLI breaking fast enough to matter: burn rate = (observed bad-event ratio) ÷ (1 − SLO). Page at 14.4× over 1h (2% of a 30-day budget), ticket at 1× over 3 days. Cause-based alerts (CPU high, disk 80%, pod restarted) go to dashboards and tickets, never to a pager (slos.md).
Every recurring obligation has a last-run date. Restore drills, secret rotation, access review, dependency and base-image refresh, SLO review, alert hygiene, postmortem action sweeps — each is a row in the ## Due table of memory.md with its cadence and last run. A cadence with no recorded last run is skipped for two quarters and nobody notices until the day it mattered.
Manual production access is an exception with a record, not a workflow. Anything that survives the session goes through the pipeline. When an emergency requires a human at the console, it ends with the change reproduced in code and a line in ## Pain Points — otherwise the next apply silently reverts the fix, usually mid-incident (iac-workflow.md).

Release Strategies

Pick by what you can pay and what you can measure — not by fashion. deploy_strategy_default sets the standing choice.

Strategy	Capacity cost	Rollback speed	Requires	Use when
Recreate	1×	Redeploy old (full downtime)	Nothing	Internal tools, batch jobs, a maintenance window is acceptable
Rolling	~1.1-1.3×	Minutes: roll the old version back through	Backward-compatible API and schema during the window	The default for stateless services
Blue-green	2× for the switch window	Seconds: flip traffic back	Two full environments, a shared data layer that both versions can read and write	Cutovers that must be instantly reversible
Canary	~1.05×	Seconds: shift the slice back	Traffic splitting plus per-cohort metrics	High-traffic services where a bad release is expensive
Feature flag	1×	Instant: flip the flag	Flag infrastructure, sticky bucketing, cleanup discipline	Decoupling deploy from release; risky behavior changes

Canary sizing is a statistics problem, not a percentage habit. With zero failures in n canary requests, the 95% upper bound on the failure rate is ≈ 3/n (rule of three): 300 clean requests only prove the failure rate is below 1%. So a 1% canary on a 100 req/s service needs ~5 minutes to bound a 1% regression, and a low-traffic service cannot canary meaningfully at all — use blue-green there. Bake time must also exceed the slowest signal you rely on: if the latency alert evaluates a 5-minute window, a 2-minute bake proved nothing.

Error Budgets And Paging

Budget for a 30-day month (43,200 minutes), and the burn-rate table that turns it into alerts:

SLO	Budget / 30 days	1-hour page threshold (14.4× burn)
99%	7 h 12 min	14.4% of requests failing for an hour
99.9%	43.2 min	1.44% failing for an hour
99.95%	21.6 min	0.72% failing for an hour
99.99%	4.32 min	0.144% failing for an hour — usually beyond what a human page can save

Budget consumed	Window	Burn rate	Action
2%	1 hour	14.4×	Page
5%	6 hours	6×	Page
10%	3 days	1×	Ticket

Each page threshold pairs with a short window (about 1/12 of the long one) that must also be breaching, so a resolved blip does not page for the rest of the hour. The policy is what gives the number teeth: budget exhausted → feature deploys pause and reliability work takes priority until the trailing window recovers. An SLO with no written consequence is a dashboard decoration (slos.md).

Failure Signatures

Signature	Most likely cause	First move
Deploy reported success, users still get the old version	CDN or proxy cache, a client bundle pinned by an old index, or a rolling deploy that never finished	Verify the running artifact identity on each instance, not the pipeline's exit code
Pipeline green, production broken	The pipeline tested a different artifact or a different config than it shipped (Rule 1)	Compare the deployed identity with the tested one; then compare env var sets
Rollback made things worse	The migration already ran; the old code cannot read the new schema (Rule 5)	Contract step is the point of no return — check where the migration sits before rolling back
Works in staging, fails in production only under load	Data volume and cardinality, not code — a query plan flips when the table is 1000× bigger	Compare row counts and index usage, not configs (`environments.md`)
Intermittent CI failures with no code change	Test order dependence, shared fixtures, wall-clock/timezone assumptions, or a port already bound on the runner	Re-run the failing test alone and in reverse order before blaming infrastructure
Alert never fired during a real outage	The alert depends on the failing system (metrics pipeline down), or it evaluates missing data as OK	Test alerts by breaking the thing deliberately; set missing-data behavior explicitly
Everything pages at once for one root cause	No dependency-aware inhibition; every downstream service alerts on its upstream	Alert on your own SLI only; inhibit downstream pages while the upstream page is firing
Retry storm turns a blip into an outage	Retries without jitter or budget, plus timeouts longer than the caller's	Cap retries at ~10% of request volume, exponential backoff with jitter, timeout budget shrinks per hop (`capacity.md`)
First deploy after a quiet period fails	Expired credential, rotated token, drifted infrastructure, or a base image that no longer exists	Check credential expiry and drift before reading application logs (`iac-workflow.md`)
Restore fails when it is finally needed	Backups were verified as existing, never as restorable — missing keys, roles, parameter groups	Timed restore drill into a scratch environment (`recovery.md`)
Anything else	Get the artifact identity, the config diff, and the timestamp of the last change to either	The change that immediately precedes the symptom is the suspect until eliminated

DORA Scoreboard

Four metrics; each recommendation in this skill should name which one it moves. DORA's research programme places its elite band near: deploy on demand (multiple times per day), change lead time under an hour, change failure rate roughly 0-15%, and service restored in under an hour. Treat them as directional bands, not certification thresholds.

Metric	How to measure it without new tooling	The lever that moves it
Deploy frequency	Count rows in `releases/.md` per week	Batch size (Rule 3), approval gates, pipeline duration
Change lead time	Merge timestamp → deploy timestamp, median	Pipeline time (Rule 4), manual gates, environment queueing
Change failure rate	Releases with a rollback or a hotfix within 24h ÷ all releases	Test signal quality, canary sizing, migration discipline
Time to restore	Incident start → service restored, from `incidents/.md`	Rollback readiness (Rule 2), runbooks, alert latency

Measure for two weeks before proposing an improvement: without the baseline, every intervention "works". A team below one deploy per week should fix batch size and pipeline time before buying any tooling.

Output Gates

Before delivering a pipeline, a deploy plan, a policy, or an incident artifact:

Does the plan name which of the four DORA metrics it moves, and what it costs to keep running?
Is the thing being deployed the artifact that was tested, identified by digest or immutable version (Rule 1)?
Is the rollback path a recorded artifact identity, and does it survive the migration state this change leaves behind (Rules 2, 5)?
Are credentials short-lived or scoped, with no secret in a log, an env dump, an artifact, or anywhere under ~/Clawic/data/ (Rule 6)?
Does every new alert correspond to a user-visible symptom with an owner and an action, and does every removed alert say what now covers it?
Is any step destructive (drop, prune, force-apply, delete environment, restore over live data)? Then it names exactly what dies and ships with an explicit confirmation step, never inside a copy-paste block of read-only commands.
Did anything durable come out of this — a service, an environment, a release, an incident, an SLO, a cadence, a runbook, a decision? Then it is written to its box in memory-template.md, with its ## Boxes line, in this same turn.

Configuration

User-dependent variables. Defaults apply until the user states a preference; store them in ~/Clawic/data/devops/config.yaml.

Variable	Type	Default	Effect
ci_platform	github-actions \| gitlab-ci \| jenkins \| buildkite \| circleci \| azure-devops \| none	none	Dialect of every pipeline example and the cache backend recommended in `pipelines.md`; while unset, name the platform being assumed before writing a pipeline file
iac_tool	terraform \| opentofu \| pulumi \| cloudformation \| cdk \| ansible \| none	terraform	Language and workflow of `iac-workflow.md`, including the drift-check and policy-gate commands
deploy_model	push \| gitops	push	Whether deploys are pipeline-driven (`deploys.md`) or reconciled from a repo (`gitops.md`)
environment_chain	list	[dev, staging, prod]	The promotion path in `environments.md`; each added environment adds a gate, a config set, and a cost line
deploy_strategy_default	rolling \| blue-green \| canary \| recreate	rolling	Standing choice in Release Strategies and the shape of every generated deploy plan
version_scheme	semver \| calver \| git-sha	git-sha	Identity stamped on artifacts and releases, and what `releases/.md` records
pipeline_time_budget_min	number (min, 1-120)	10	The PR-feedback ceiling Rule 4 enforces and the threshold for calling a pipeline slow
slo_target_pct	number (90-99.999)	99.9	Default availability target, its error budget, and every burn-rate threshold in `slos.md`
secrets_backend	vault \| aws-secrets-manager \| gcp-sm \| azure-kv \| sops \| 1password \| ci-native	ci-native	Where `secrets.md` puts secrets, what the pointer scheme looks like, and how rotation is described
observability_stack	prometheus-grafana \| datadog \| cloudwatch \| new-relic \| elastic \| otel-generic \| none	none	Query dialect and cost model in `observability.md` and `slos.md`
oncall_model	none \| business-hours \| rotation-24x7 \| follow-the-sun	business-hours	Rotation sizing, escalation, and severity definitions in `incidents.md`; also whether paging advice applies at all
approval_gate	none \| prod-only \| all	prod-only	Where a human approval sits in the promotion path, and what evidence the pipeline must capture for it
compliance_regime	none \| soc2 \| iso27001 \| pci \| hipaa \| fedramp	none	Forces separation of duties, retention, and audit-evidence capture into the pipeline and the artifact list

Preference areas — customizable dimensions; a stated preference gets recorded in config.yaml and applied from then on:

Tooling — artifact registry, feature-flag system, paging provider, load-testing tool, policy engine, dependency-update bot — affects which product's shape every example takes
Conventions — branch model (trunk-based vs release branches), tag and release naming, environment naming, service ownership metadata, runbook location — affects generated files and platform.md
Platform — where workloads run (single host, VMs, containers, serverless, managed platform), cloud provider, region and data-residency constraints — affects capacity.md, recovery.md, and every cutover plan
Safety posture — appetite for automated rollback, whether destructive commands are emitted at all, blast-radius limits per change, freeze windows — affects Output Gates and deploys.md
Work order — review gates, who approves what, whether migrations ship with or ahead of code, pairing on production changes — affects the promotion path in environments.md
Compliance and restrictions — the CVE remediation SLA per severity (supply-chain.md), audit-evidence and log retention floors, data-residency limits, separation-of-duties requirements, vetoed technologies or registries — recorded under a compliance block in config.yaml; compliance_regime sets the ones a regime dictates, the rest are the user's own
Cadence — restore drills, game days, secret rotation, access review, dependency refresh, SLO and alert review, postmortem action sweeps — every accepted cadence becomes a row in the ## Due table of memory.md
Output register — plan-first vs command-first, how much reasoning to keep, whether to produce diffs or whole files, incident-comms tone — affects every answer's shape

Traps

Trap	Why it fails	Do instead
Rebuilding the artifact for production	The tested bytes and the shipped bytes differ; every "only in prod" bug starts here	Promote one artifact by identity (Rule 1)
"Rollback = revert the commit and redeploy"	That is a roll-forward through the full pipeline, at the worst possible moment	Keep the previous artifact deployable and its identity recorded (Rule 2)
Migration and application change in one deploy	The rollback path no longer exists the moment the migration runs	Expand/contract across three deploys (Rule 5)
Alerting on CPU, memory, or restart counts	They fire when nothing is wrong and stay quiet when everything is	Symptom SLI plus burn rate (Rule 7); resources belong on dashboards
Staging with toy data	Query plans, timeouts, and pagination bugs only appear at production cardinality	Match shape and order of magnitude, anonymized (`environments.md`)
Long-lived cloud keys in CI secrets	They outlive the person who created them and grant more than the job needs	OIDC federation, scoped per environment (Rule 6)
Canary at 1% for two minutes on a low-traffic service	The sample cannot detect the regression it exists to catch	Size the canary from the rule of three, or use blue-green
Deploy freeze as risk management	Batches the quarter's changes into one release nobody can bisect	Smaller, more frequent releases; freeze only what the calendar genuinely forbids (Rule 3)
Postmortem action items with no owner or date	Completion rate collapses and the same incident recurs	One owner, one date, tracked in `## Due` until closed (`incidents.md`)
Runbook that lives in the system that goes down	The wiki is on the cluster that is on fire	Runbook in `artifacts/`, plus a copy the on-call can open offline
Secret "rotated" by adding a new one	The old credential stays valid forever; the leak is still live	Rotation is issue → cut over → revoke → verify the old one fails (`secrets.md`)
Retry logic added without a budget	Retries multiply load exactly when the system is weakest	Cap retries as a fraction of traffic, jitter the backoff, shrink the timeout per hop
Auto-merging dependency updates on a green pipeline	"Green" means your tests passed, not that the change is safe or the package is genuine	Gate on provenance and a CVE policy; batch and review majors (`supply-chain.md`)
One giant IaC state or one giant pipeline	Every change waits behind every other change, and one bad apply blocks all of them	Split by blast radius and lifecycle (`iac-workflow.md`)
Buying an observability platform before defining an SLI	Cost scales with cardinality and the question stays unanswered	Define the SLI, instrument that, then price the storage (`observability.md`)
Measuring the team by deploy count alone	Deploy frequency without change failure rate rewards shipping breakage	Read all four DORA metrics together (`platform.md`)

Where Experts Disagree

Trunk-based vs release branches. Trunk-based with flags is the default when you ship the one version you host. Release branches earn their overhead only when customers run versions you cannot upgrade (on-prem, mobile, embedded) — then the cost is real and unavoidable.
GitOps pull vs pipeline push. Pull-based reconciliation wins on drift correction, audit, and many clusters; push wins on simplicity, on ordering across non-Kubernetes resources, and on being debuggable by whoever is awake. The frontier is cluster count and whether anyone will own the reconciler (gitops.md).
A staging environment vs testing in production. Flags, canaries, and shadow traffic catch what staging cannot, at the price of exposure. The frontier is whether you can legally and practically reproduce production data volume elsewhere; regulated data usually forces a real staging environment.
Dedicated platform/SRE team vs "you build it, you run it". Below roughly a dozen engineers, a platform team is overhead and the same people do both. The signal to specialize is duplicated pipelines and a rising share of time spent on delivery plumbing rather than a headcount number (platform.md).
Automated rollback on SLO breach. Automating it cuts time-to-restore and occasionally reverts a good release during an unrelated outage. Teams with reliable canary signal automate; teams whose signal is noisy get faster recovery from a rehearsed human decision (Rule 2).
How much to standardize. A golden path raises the floor and lowers the ceiling. The defensible line: standardize what breaks production (deploy, secrets, observability, rollback) and leave language, framework, and test style to the teams.

Security & Privacy

Credentials: this skill designs pipelines and deploys that consume credentials from the platform's own secret store, an OIDC federation, or an OS keychain. It does NOT store, log, copy, or transmit tokens, keys, or passwords, and never writes a credential into ~/Clawic/data/.

Local storage: service and environment inventory, release and incident records, SLOs, cadences, and generated artifacts stay in ~/Clawic/data/devops/ on this machine, plus rows in the shared servers/, contacts/, projects/, domains/, and finances/ boxes. Names, versions, digests, dates, and pointers only — no secret values.

Guardrails: commands are read-only by default. Destructive operations (force apply, environment teardown, restore over live data, prune, drop) name exactly what they destroy and require explicit confirmation.

More Clawic skills, get them at https://clawic.com/skills/devops (install if the user confirms):

docker — building and running the images this pipeline ships
k8s — Kubernetes manifests and cluster debugging for the deploy target
terraform — HCL authoring, state surgery, module design
github-actions — workflow syntax, reusable pipelines, runner configuration
feature-flags (planned) — cohort targeting, kill switches, and flag-debt cleanup in depth

Feedback

If useful, star it: https://clawic.com/skills/devops
Latest version: https://clawic.com/skills/devops

Part of Clawic, the verified skill library. Get this skill: https://clawic.com/skills/devops.

Questions people ask

Can it help choose a deployment and rollback strategy?: Yes. It compares rolling, blue-green, and canary approaches by capacity cost, rollback speed, and canary measurability. Rollbacks use a previously recorded immutable artifact rather than rebuilding a branch.
How does it approach slow or unreliable CI pipelines?: It orders stages by failure catch rate per second, then considers caching, parallelism, and moving work off the pull-request path. It also ranks common causes of local/CI differences and quarantines flaky tests with a rule and expiry date.
Does it store pipeline secrets or credentials?: No. Credentials are never written to its local data notes; secret values are stripped and replaced with references such as environment-variable, vault, or key-file pointers. It recommends short-lived, scoped credentials such as OIDC federation.

DevOps

What it does

When to use it

The skill document

When To Use

Quick Reference

Core Rules

Release Strategies

Error Budgets And Paging

Failure Signatures

DORA Scoreboard

Output Gates

Configuration

Traps

Where Experts Disagree

Security & Privacy

Feedback

Questions people ask

Related skills

Developer

Google Cloud

AWS | Amazon Web Services

SaaS

Plan

Kubernetes

What it does

When to use it

The skill document

When To Use

Quick Reference

Core Rules

Release Strategies

Error Budgets And Paging

Failure Signatures

DORA Scoreboard

Output Gates

Configuration

Traps

Where Experts Disagree

Security & Privacy

Related Skills

Feedback

Questions people ask

Related skills

Developer

Google Cloud

AWS | Amazon Web Services

SaaS

Plan

Kubernetes